Intravenous low-dose ketamine offers no pre-emptive effect: An updated meta-analysis.

Authors: Lynn Hong, Tony Chow, Colin Goodchild, Elean To & John J McNeil.

Oral Presentation (S121) at the 13th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists Paris, 20th April 2004

Purpose: The pre-emptive analgesic effect of iv low-dose ketamine was deemed encouraging in a systematic review by Schmid et al. (1999).1 However, subsequent randomized trials have not supported this conclusion. This article systematically updates the literature, on the pre-emptive effect of ketamine in the peri-operative setting.

Methods: The computer strategy (double blind$ or random$).af was used to identify randomized trials pertaining to ketamine. This strategy has been shown to have a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 98%.2 Double blinded, randomized trials comparing iv ketamine used before surgical incision versus after incision were identified. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 4.2.3 Cochrane Collaboration. Using the Random Effects Model the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI were calculated from the mean 24-hour opioid consumption and initial VAS scores.

Results: Nine studies were identified containing a total of 424 patients. The studies contained iv ketamine regimens ranging from 0.15 to 1.0 mg/kg. The SMD were -0.11 (95%CI -0.49 to 0.26) for opioid consumption and 0.15 (95%CI -0.76 to 1.06) for VAS scores. Both were not statistically significant as the 95%CI included one.

Discussion: Our results suggest that pre-incision ketamine offers no pre-emptive effect in terms of pain relief or subsequent opioid requirements. It is apparent that conclusions drawn as recent as five years ago,1 may no longer be valid. This article highlights the importance to update medical information as it becomes available. The results of which may significantly impact on our clinical practice.

References:

1 Schmid RL, Sandler L, Kat J. Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: a review of current techniques and outcomes. Pain 82;1999:111-125.

2 Chow T, To E, Goodchild C, McNeil J. A simple, fast, easy method to identify the evidence base in pain relief research: Validation of a computer search strategy used alone to identify quality randomized controlled trials. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2004: in press.